Aa. Dorion et al., Measurement of the corpus callosum using magnetic resonance imaging: Analyses of methods and techniques, PERC MOT SK, 92(3), 2001, pp. 1075-1094
Since the first postmortem report of sex-related differences in the size of
the human corpus callosum, a number of studies on sex differences have bee
n published, but results conflicted. The aim of this review was not to asse
ss the possible existence and magnitude of sex variations in the size of th
e corpus callosum but to analyze methodological differences in several stud
ies using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to investigate the sexual dimorphism i
n the size of the corpus callosum. Methodological problems arise at several
steps of the method: sampling, imagery techniques, and measurements. Moreo
ver, the means of callosal areas obtained by the nine reported studies are
significantly different. The hypothesis that methodological differences cou
ld explain these differences is supported by statistical results. A common
method for investigating sex-related differences in callosal morphology app
ears necessary to resolve the question of a real sexual dimorphism of the c
orpus callosum and its subregions.