With the need to juggle design requirements. recommendations. personal opin
ions, and company preferences, how, does one determine a safe, cost-effecti
ve risk reduction design? A quick solution may be to incorporate all potent
ial safeguards, but that is neither practical nor cost-effective, Companies
have turned to various methods to evaluate their mitigation options for fi
re, explosion, and reactivity, hazards. Most methods simply, identify the h
igh-risk issues,. they do riot determine the most cost-effective risk reduc
tion options.
Whether it is for a capital project, regulatory compliance, or to define st
andards, cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a proven method for cost-effective
risk management. Three case studies are presented in this paper to illustra
te the flexibility and benefits of this approach.