How does Sergei Eisenstein's famed film, October, relate to the events of O
ctober that it recounts? Is the film Bolshevik propaganda or history? These
are the questions addressed by this essay. The strategy is to place Eisens
tein and his work alongside five well-regarded histories of the Bolshevik R
evolution written between 1919 and 1998. Seen in this context, the film pro
ves to be--aside from a couple of wholly invented sequences--a work of hist
ory in which the interpretation of major events and figures of the revoluti
on compares favourably with that of one or more well-known historians. The
essay also explains how Eisenstein presents history, often compressing even
ts into visual symbols or metaphors. It also explains how the director's mo
st obvious inventions (the 'storming' of the Winter Palace and the raising
of the Bridges over the Neva during the 'July days') provide a certain kind
of 'visual' truth, allowing the filmmaker to speak of events of the revolu
tion that occur outside the framework of the famed 'Ten Days That Shook the
World'.