Phasic activities of rapid eye movement sleep in Vegetative State patients

Citation
A. Oksenberg et al., Phasic activities of rapid eye movement sleep in Vegetative State patients, SLEEP, 24(6), 2001, pp. 703-706
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
SLEEP
ISSN journal
01618105 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
703 - 706
Database
ISI
SICI code
0161-8105(20010915)24:6<703:PAOREM>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Study objectives: To assess the phasic components of rapid eye movement (RE M) sleep in patients in vegetative state and to evaluate the possible relat ionship of these activities to patient outcome. Setting: Sleep disorders unit at a major rehabilitation hospital. Design: Comparative control study. Patients: Eleven patients in vegetative state (10 males and 1 female) aged 17-53 years. Interventions: Continuous 24-hour polysomnographic recording. Measurements and Results: All the patients had REM sleep periods during the 24-hr recording session. Mean total REM sleep time for the whole session w as 66.5+/-34.9 min, and for the nocturnal hours only, 37.3+/-19.7 min. Comp arison with the control group (792.+/-11.5 min) yielded a significant diffe rence only for nocturnal REM sleep time (p<0.0003). The duration of the REM sleep periods was significantly shorter in the patients than the controls for the whole 24-hr session (10.9+/-6.0 vs. 19.6+/-4.9 min, p<0.008), but n ot for the nocturnal period alone. Compared to controls, the density of rap id eye movements (REMs) (p=0.001), chin twitches (p=0.002), and leg muscle twitches (p=0.023) was significantly lower in the patient group. The densit y of the sawtooth waves was also lower in the patients, but the difference did not reach significance (p=0.069). Similar results were obtained when th e comparison was done only for the nocturnal period. There was no significa nt difference for any of the REM sleep characteristics or REM sleep phasic activities (24-hr, nocturnal and diurnal periods) between the patients who recovered consciousness and those who did not. Conclusions: The present study shows that patients in vegetative state have a significant reduction in the phasic activities of REM sleep. However, th e amount of these activities is unrelated to recovery from the clinical con dition. These findings may reflect possible damage to the pedunculopontine tegmentum cholinergic mechanisms in vegetative state.