COMPARISON OF THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFI CITY OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC CRITERIA FOR LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY ACCORDING TO THE ROMHILT-ESTES, SOKOLOW-LYON, CORNELL AND RODRIGUEZ-PADIAL METHODS
M. Cabezas et al., COMPARISON OF THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFI CITY OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC CRITERIA FOR LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY ACCORDING TO THE ROMHILT-ESTES, SOKOLOW-LYON, CORNELL AND RODRIGUEZ-PADIAL METHODS, Revista espanola de cardiologia, 50(1), 1997, pp. 31-35
Introduction and objectives. Because left ventricular mass is associat
ed with an increase in the risk of morbidity and mortality of cardiova
scular diseases in the general population having the electrocardiogram
as an accesible and inexpensive method for the diagnosis of left vent
ricular hypertrophy, we decided to calculate the sensitivity and speci
ficity of 5 electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of left ve
ntricular hypertrophy and to compare the results of the original autho
rs to ours. Patients and methods. 135 patients were evaluated; 46 pati
ents were excluded by the following criteria: chronic obstructive pulm
onary disease, complete left or right bundle branch block, cardiovascu
lar ischemic disease or Wolf-Parkinson-White Syndrome. 89 patients rem
ained and had an electrocardiogram performed applying the following cr
iteria: Romhilt-Estes Point-Score system, Sokolow-Lyon (SV1 + RV5 or V
6 > 3,5 mV) and (RaVL > 1.1 mV), Cornell and Rodriguez Padial. Left ve
ntricular hypertrophy was defined by the Penn Convention Criteria. Res
ults. In our study we obtained the following results: a) Romhilt-Estes
had a sensitivity of 12% and a specificity of 87%; b) Sokolow-Lyon (S
V1 + RV5 or V6) had a sensitivity of 22% and a specificity of 79%; c)
Sokolow-Lyon (RaVL) has a sensitivity of 18% and a specificity of 92%;
d) Cornel had a sensitivity of 31% and a specificity of 87%, and e) R
odriguez Padial had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 8%. Ther
e are similarities between our results and the authors's original ones
, However, there are significant statistical differences between them
(p less than or equal to 0,01). Conclusion. Our conclusion is that the
se criteria have a low diagnostic value in the isolated interpretation
of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, and we need to integra
te them with the whole medical history and physical examination.