Infection rates in surgical procedures: a comparison of cefalexin vs. a placebo

Citation
A. Daude-lagrave et al., Infection rates in surgical procedures: a comparison of cefalexin vs. a placebo, VET COMP OR, 14(3), 2001, pp. 146-150
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
09320814 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
146 - 150
Database
ISI
SICI code
0932-0814(200108)14:3<146:IRISPA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxi s in small animal surgery. Three hundred and twenty-nine dogs and 544 cats were included in a prospective, randomised, blind trial to determine the fr equency of wound infection after clean and clean-contaminated surgical proc edures. The animals were allocated to one of two groups: group A received a placebo and group B received cefalexin. The infection rate was measured in each group and correlated with different criteria (age, duration and type of the operation, anaesthetic and Altemeier's class, surgeon's experience). Globally, seventy-eight cases of infection were noted (8.9%). The infectio n rates in the two groups were not significantly different (9.4% in group A and 8.5% in group B). Infection rate was not affected by the different cri teria studied. However, the percentage of animals infected in group B tende d to be lower than that of group A as the surgeons' experience increased.