Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy- A randomized, controlled trial
M. Boogaerts et al., Intravenous and oral itraconazole versus intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate as empirical antifungal therapy for persistent fever in neutropenic patients with cancer who are receiving broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy- A randomized, controlled trial, ANN INT MED, 135(6), 2001, pp. 412-422
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Amphotericin B deoxycholate is currently the standard empirical
antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer who have persistent
fever that does not respond to antibiotic therapy. However, this treatment
often causes infusion-related and metabolic toxicities, which may be dose
limiting,
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of itraconazole with those of
amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy.
Design: An open randomized, controlled, multicenter trial, powered for equi
valence.
Setting: 60 oncology centers in 10 countries.
Patients: 384 neutropenic patients with cancer who had persistent fever tha
t did not respond to antibiotic therapy. Intervention: Intravenous amphoter
icin B or intravenous itraconazole followed by oral itraconazole solution.
Measurements: Defervescence, breakthrough fungal infection, drug-related ad
verse events, and death.
Results: For itraconazole and amphotericin B, the median duration of therap
y was 8.5 and 7 days and the median time to defervescence was 7 and 6 days,
respectively. The intention-to-treat efficacy analysis of data from 360 pa
tients showed response rates of 47% and 38% for itraconazole and amphoteric
in B, respectively (difference, 9.0 percentage points [95% Cl, -0.8 to 19.5
percentage points]). Fewer drug-related adverse events occurred in the itr
aconazole group than the amphotericin B group (5% vs. 54% of patients; P =
0.001), and the rate of withdrawal because of toxicity was significantly lo
wer with itraconazole (19% vs. 38%; P = 0.001). Significantly more amphoter
icin B recipients had nephrotoxicity (P < 0.001). Breakthrough fungal infec
tions (S patients in each group) and mortality rates (19 deaths in the itra
conazole group and 25 deaths in the amphotericin B group) were similar. Six
ty-five patients switched to oral itraconazole solution after receiving the
intravenous formulation for a median of 9 days.
Conclusions: Itraconazole and amphotericin B have at least equivalent effic
acy as empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with cancer. Ho
wever, itraconazole Is associated with significantly less toxicity.