Comparison of new topical treatments for herpes labialis - Efficacy of penciclovir cream, acyclovir cream, and n-docosanol cream against experimentalcutaneous herpes simplex virus type 1 infection
Ab. Mckeough et Sl. Spruance, Comparison of new topical treatments for herpes labialis - Efficacy of penciclovir cream, acyclovir cream, and n-docosanol cream against experimentalcutaneous herpes simplex virus type 1 infection, ARCH DERMAT, 137(9), 2001, pp. 1153-1158
Background: There are 3 new topical treatments for herpes labialis that hav
e either been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (penciclovir
cream [Denavir] and n-docosanol cream [Abreva]) or recently undergone exten
sive clinical evaluation (acyclovir cream). The relative efficacy of these
products is unknown.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of penciclovir cream, acyclovir cream, n
-docosanol cream, and acyclovir ointment in an experimental animal model of
cutaneous herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) disease.
Design: The backs of guinea pigs were infected with HSV-1 using a vaccinati
on instrument. Active treatments and corresponding vehicle controls were ap
plied for 3 to 5 days beginning 24 hours after inoculation.
Main Outcome Measures: After completion of treatment, the animals were kill
ed and the severity of the infection assessed from the number of lesions, t
he total lesion area, and the lesion virus titer.
Results: Penciclovir cream effected modest reductions in lesion number (19%
), area (38%), and virus titer (88%) compared with its vehicle control, and
each of these differences was significantly greater (P<.05) than the reduc
tions effected by acyclovir ointment (0%, 21%, and 75%, respectively). The
acyclovir cream effect (reductions of 4%, 28%, and 77%, respectively) was l
ess than that of penciclovir cream, and this difference was confirmed by 2
additional head-to-head experiments, Two experiments with n-docosanol cream
failed to show statistically significant differences by any parameter betw
een n-docasonol cream and vehicle control-treated sites or between n-docosa
nol and untreated infection sites.
Conclusions: In this model, the efficacy of penciclovir cream was greater t
han acyclovir cream, acyclovir cream was greater than or equal to acyclovir
ointment, and acyclovir ointment was greater than n-docosanol cream. Since
our model was designed to evaluate compounds that function primarily throu
gh antiviral activity, the negative findings with n-docosanol in these stud
ies do not exclude that it might work clinically through other mechanisms.