J. Sarini et al., Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients - A long-term retrospective review of 273 cases, ARCH OTOLAR, 127(9), 2001, pp. 1089-1092
Background: The prolongation of life expectancy results in an increasing nu
mber of malignant neoplasms occurring in the elderly population. For a long
time these patients were not considered good candidates to receive aggress
ive therapy and probably were inadequately treated in many instances.
Objective: To assess the outcome of patients older than 74 years who had ha
d head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Materials and Methods: In our database of 4610 consecutive patients with he
ad and neck squamous cell carcinomas who were evaluated and treated at the
Centre Oscar Lambret, Northern France Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lille, o
ver a 10-year period (1974-1983), we identified 273 patients who were 75 ye
ars or older. The outcome was updated for all patients included in the data
base.
Results: A significantly higher proportion of females were noted in the old
er patient group (43/273, 15.8%) than in younger patient group (192/4337, 4
.4%, P<.001). There were no differences for primary site except for hypopha
ryngeal squamous cell carcinoma that occurred less frequently in the elderl
y patients (8.8% vs 14.5%, borderline significance P=.02). There were no di
fferences for TNM stage grouping, histological classification, incidences o
f previous cancer, and comorbidities. Surgery was performed in a smaller pr
oportion of older patients (13.9% vs 27.4%, P<.001, for the primary site an
d 15.4% vs 35.6%, P<.001, for those occurring in the neck) as well as chemo
therapy that was delivered in 5.5% vs 17.7% (P<.001). On the contrary, ther
e was no difference in radiotherapeutic treatments. Tolerance to treatment
was similar and there was the same proportion of persistent diseases 2 mont
hs after completion of the overall treatment (27.8% vs 25.4%, P=.94). Pooli
ng local, regional, and distant failures and metachronous cancers, there wa
s a borderline lower incidence in older patients (57.1% vs 64.2%, P=.02), w
hich is explained by an obvious shorter life expectancy. If survival is not
meaningful in such a comparison (5-year survival 23.8% vs 36.4%), then the
causes of deaths may be compared. Among the 4067 patients who were dead at
the last update, index tumor evolution-related deaths numbered 130 (48.1%
of dead patients in this cohort) in older patients compared with 2045 (53.9
% of dead patients in this cohort), which was not significantly different.
There was no difference in treatment-related deaths (11.1% vs 9.3%). Fewer
intercurrent disease-related deaths occurred in the older patients (19.7% v
s 11.8%).
Conclusions: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients did
not seem to have a significantly different outcome when compared with head
and neck squamous cell carcinoma occurring in younger patients. When proper
ly monitored, conventional therapies seem feasible in older patients.