Purpose: The present study was conducted to evaluate 4 different fluid deli
very systems: Arthrex AR-6450, Stryker 1.5L High Flow Pump, Arthro FMS 4, a
nd Acufex InteliJet. Their flow and pressure capacity, as specified by the
manufacturer, and their accuracy, as measured in a standardized fashion, we
re compared with directly measured pressure values. Type of Study: Experime
ntal study. Methods: Two experiments were performed: (1) the achieved press
ure was measured with the pressure sensor within a ball and compared with t
he preset pressure values. The pressure was increased constantly while the
flow was kept constant. (2) maximum flow per minute was tested using a beak
er and a stopwatch. Results: The highest measured pressures for the Arthrex
and the Stryker pumps were 115 mm Hg (46% of published maximum pressure) a
nd 113 mm Hg (57% of published maximum pressure), respectively. The highest
measured pressures for the Arthro FMS 4 and the InteliJet pumps were 251 m
m Hg (101% of published pressure) and 132 mm Hg (88% of published maximum p
ressure), respectively. The maximal flow values for the Arthrex and Stryker
pumps were 900 mL/min (56.3%) and 675 mL/min (48%), respectively. The Arth
ro FMS 4 and InteliJet pumps reached a maximal flow of 450 mL/min (56%) and
1,250 mL/min (62.5%). Conclusions: In the simpler pumps (Arthrex AR-6450 a
nd Stryker 1.5L High Flow Pump), the pressure on the display must be set to
higher values compared with the outflow-controlling pumps (Arthro FMS 4 an
InteliJet) to achieve the same intra-articular pressure. All pumps were ab
le to maintain a pressure of 60 mm Hg very accurately. Therefore, a surgeon
can trust all of the pumps when the pressure is set below 60 mm Hg.