The impact of G-protein expression on the coupling specificity of the human
alpha (2B)-adrenergic receptor (alpha (2B)-AR) was studied in Sf9 cells. T
he alpha (2B)-AR was shown to activate both coexpressed G(s)- and G(l)-prot
eins in a [S-35]GTP gammaS binding assay. Noradrenaline and the synthetic a
gonist UK14,304 were equally potent and efficacious in stimulating Gi activ
ation. At the effector level (adenylyl cyclase), both ligands stimulated cA
MP production. In the presence of forskolin, the effects of the agonists we
re more complex. Noradrenaline stimulated cAMP production, while UK14,304 s
howed a biphasic concentration-response curve with inhibition of stimulated
cAMP production at low agonist concentrations and further stimulation at h
igh agonist concentrations. G(s) coexpression. caused a monophasic stimulat
ory response with both ligands. Coexpression with G(i) resulted in a biphas
ic concentration-response curve for noradrenaline and a monophasic inhibiti
on with UK14,304. Experiments with a panel of agonists demonstrated that th
e more efficacious an agonist is in stimulating cAMP production, the weaker
is its ability to couple to inhibition of cAMP accumulation via exogenous
G(i). To be able to explain the mechanistic consequences of dual G-protein
coupling described above, we developed a mathematical model based on the hy
pothesis that an agonist induces different conformations of the receptor ha
ving different affinity for different G-proteins. The model reproduced the
profiles seen in the concentration-response curves with G(s) and G(i) coexp
ression. The model predicts that the affinity of the receptor conformation
for G-proteins as well as the availability of G-proteins will determine the
ultimate response of the receptor. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All righ
ts reserved.