Ta. El-toukhy et Ae. Davies, The efficacy of laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: results of a prospective controlled study, BJU INT, 88(4), 2001, pp. 361-366
Objective To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic mesh colposuspension
as an equivalent approach to the 'gold standard' open Burch colposuspension
.
Patients and methods A prospective controlled study of laparoscopic mesh co
lposuspension was conducted over 2 years: 87 patients with genuine stress i
ncontinence (GSI) were recruited. The preoperative evaluation included a hi
story, examination, midstream urine analysis, urinary voiding diary, a Uril
os pad test, and twin-channel subtracted cystometry, including urethral pro
filometry and measurement of the postvoid residual volume. The study includ
ed patients who had undergone previous incontinence surgery, but those with
detrusor instability or neurogenic bladder were excluded. The patients wer
e assessed at 6 weeks. 6 months and I year after surgery and then yearly th
ereafter. The urodynamic assessment was repeated 3 months after surgery.
Results Forty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic colposuspension using Pr
olene mesh and titanium tacks to elevate the bladder neck, while 38 patient
s had open Burch colposuspension. There was no difference between the group
s ill age, parity. body mass index. menopausal status, medical history. pre
vious bladder neck surgery and prolapse. At 6 weeks the cure rate was simil
arly high in the two groups (91% laparoscopic and 94% open). After a mean f
ollow-up of 32 months, both groups showed it decline in efficacy, which was
more marked in the laparoscopic group. Cure rates were 62% for laparoscopy
and 79% for open surgery, and the improvement rates were 77% and 89%, resp
ectively (P < 0.05).
Conclusion Laparoscopic colposuspension using a mesh and tacker technique r
educes the technical difficulty and operating time of the endoscopic proced
ure. but the long-term cure rates are inferior to open Burch colposuspensio
n.