While many aspects of stock and option based compensation for corporate off
icers remain controversial, we suggest that the growing trend for similar p
ractices in favor of boards of directors will prove to be even more content
ious. High-ranking corporate managers do not set their own salaries nor aut
horize their own stock options. By contrast, boards of directors do, in fac
t, set their own compensation packages. Other potential conflicts of intere
st include setting option performance targets, stock buybacks, stock option
resets and reloads, consolidations (mergers and acquisitions), and service
on multiple boards. As trust is the most valuable commodity in a capitalis
t society, we suggest that these potential conflicts of interest and relate
d outcomes may ultimately serve to erode any anticipated benefits of direct
or stock compensation.