Pretty patterns but a simple strategy: predator-prey interactions between juvenile herring and Atlantic puffins observed with multibeam sonar

Citation
Be. Axelsen et al., Pretty patterns but a simple strategy: predator-prey interactions between juvenile herring and Atlantic puffins observed with multibeam sonar, CAN J ZOOL, 79(9), 2001, pp. 1586-1596
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE
ISSN journal
00084301 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1586 - 1596
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-4301(200109)79:9<1586:PPBASS>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Predator-prey interactions between Atlantic puffins (Fratercula arctica) an d newly metamorphosed herring (Clupea harengus) were studied in the Lofoten -Rost area in northern Norway using a high-resolution multibeam sonar syste m. Attacks from diving puffins and predatory fish induced massive predator- response patterns at the school level, including bend, vacuole, hourglass, pseudopodium, herd, and split. All patterns have previously been observed, using the same sonar, in schools of adult herring attacked by groups of kil ler whales. Tight ball, the prevailing response pattern in adult fish under predation, was not observed, but a new pattern, intraschool density propag ation, was found and interpreted as an analogue to tight-ball formations mo ving rapidly within the school. The observed patterns persisted much longer than in schools of adult herring attacked by killer whales, reflecting the different hunting strategies. Traditionally, the repertoire of predator re sponses observed in schooling fish has been interpreted as a range of co op erative tactics to trick predators, but this has recently been challenged b y authors who suggested that fish that behave the same way produce differen t patterns at group level simply by maintaining a minimum approach distance to predators and hiding behind conspecifics (the "selfish herd"), and that the particular combination of group size and number and behaviour of preda tors, rather than different individual tactics, determines the outcome at g roup level. Our findings support the latter hypothesis.