P. Pelosi et al., Effects of different continuous positive airway pressure devices and periodic hyperinflations on respiratory function, CRIT CARE M, 29(9), 2001, pp. 1683-1689
Objective: To compare the effect on respiratory function of different conti
nuous positive airway pressure systems and periodic hyperinflations in pati
ents with respiratory failure.
Design: Prospective
Setting: Hospital intensive care unit.
Patients: Sixteen intubated patients (eight men and eight women, age 54 +/-
18 yrs, Pao(2)/Fio(2) 277 +/- 58 torr, positive end-expiratory pressure 6.
2 +/- 2.0 cm H2O).
Interventions: We evaluated continuous flow positive airway pressure system
s with high or low flow plus a reservoir bag equipped with spring-loaded me
chanical or underwater seal positive end-expiratory pressure valve and a co
ntinuous positive airway pressure by a Servo 300 C ventilator with or witho
ut periodic hyperinflations (three assisted breaths per minute with constan
t inspiratory pressure of 30 cm H2O over positive end-expiratory pressure).
Measurements and Main Results: We measured the respiratory pattern, work of
breathing, dyspnea sensation, end-expiratory lung volume, and gas exchange
. We found the following: a) Work of breathing and gas exchange were compar
able between continuous flow systems; b) the ventilator continuous positive
airway pressure was not different compared with continuous flow systems; a
nd c) continuous positive airway pressure with periodic hyperinflations red
uced work of breathing (10.7 +/- 9.5 vs. 6.3 +/- 5.7 J/min, p < .05) and dy
spnea sensation (1.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.8 cm, p < .05) increased end-exp
iratory lung volume (1.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.9 L, p < .05) and Pao(2) (10
0 +/- 21 vs. 120 +/- 25 torr, p < .05) compared with ventilator continuous
positive airway pressure.
Conclusions: The continuous flow positive airway pressure systems tested ar
e equally efficient; a ventilator can provide satisfactory continuous posit
ive airway pressure; and the use of periodic hyperinflations during continu
ous positive airway pressure can improve respiratory function and reduce th
e work of breathing.