Effects of different continuous positive airway pressure devices and periodic hyperinflations on respiratory function

Citation
P. Pelosi et al., Effects of different continuous positive airway pressure devices and periodic hyperinflations on respiratory function, CRIT CARE M, 29(9), 2001, pp. 1683-1689
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1683 - 1689
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200109)29:9<1683:EODCPA>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect on respiratory function of different conti nuous positive airway pressure systems and periodic hyperinflations in pati ents with respiratory failure. Design: Prospective Setting: Hospital intensive care unit. Patients: Sixteen intubated patients (eight men and eight women, age 54 +/- 18 yrs, Pao(2)/Fio(2) 277 +/- 58 torr, positive end-expiratory pressure 6. 2 +/- 2.0 cm H2O). Interventions: We evaluated continuous flow positive airway pressure system s with high or low flow plus a reservoir bag equipped with spring-loaded me chanical or underwater seal positive end-expiratory pressure valve and a co ntinuous positive airway pressure by a Servo 300 C ventilator with or witho ut periodic hyperinflations (three assisted breaths per minute with constan t inspiratory pressure of 30 cm H2O over positive end-expiratory pressure). Measurements and Main Results: We measured the respiratory pattern, work of breathing, dyspnea sensation, end-expiratory lung volume, and gas exchange . We found the following: a) Work of breathing and gas exchange were compar able between continuous flow systems; b) the ventilator continuous positive airway pressure was not different compared with continuous flow systems; a nd c) continuous positive airway pressure with periodic hyperinflations red uced work of breathing (10.7 +/- 9.5 vs. 6.3 +/- 5.7 J/min, p < .05) and dy spnea sensation (1.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.8 cm, p < .05) increased end-exp iratory lung volume (1.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.9 L, p < .05) and Pao(2) (10 0 +/- 21 vs. 120 +/- 25 torr, p < .05) compared with ventilator continuous positive airway pressure. Conclusions: The continuous flow positive airway pressure systems tested ar e equally efficient; a ventilator can provide satisfactory continuous posit ive airway pressure; and the use of periodic hyperinflations during continu ous positive airway pressure can improve respiratory function and reduce th e work of breathing.