R. Rivera-fernandez et al., Quality of life before intensive care unit admission and its influence on resource utilization and mortality rate, CRIT CARE M, 29(9), 2001, pp. 1701-1709
Objective: To analyze the quality of life of critically ill patients before
their intensive care admission and its relation to age, variables measured
in the intensive care unit (ICU; severity of illness, therapeutic effort,
resource utilization, and length of stay), and in-hospital mortality rate.
Design: Observational prospective multicenter study.
Setting: Eighty-six medical-surgical ICUs in Spain, including coronary pati
ents.
Patients: We studied 8,685 patients between 1992 and 1993. Patients < 16 yr
s old and those dying within the first 6 hrs were excluded.
Measurements and Main Results: Data collection included age, gender, admiss
ion diagnosis, severity level by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evalua
tion (APACHE) II, quality of life survey score, therapeutic activity level
by Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), and ICU and hospital mor
tality rate. Pre-ICU quality-of-life score was 3.74 +/- 4.42 points; 33.24%
of patients had a normal quality of life (0 points), and numbers of patien
ts declined logarithmically in relationship to increasing quality-of-life s
cores, with only 189 patients having a score > 15 points. Pre-ICU quality-o
f-life score correlated with age (r = .289, p < .001), with severity level
by APACHE III score (r = .217, p < .001), and weakly with TISS (r = .067, p
< .001). There was no correlation between quality of life and length of IC
U stay. Patients in hospital after ICU discharge (n = 429) had worse qualit
y of life (5.88 +/- 5.38 points) than those dying in the ICU (n = 1,453, 4.
8 +/- 4.94), who themselves had a worse quality of life than hospital survi
vors (n = 6,803, 5.05 +/- 5.07; p < .0001 by analysis of variance), with si
gnificant differences between all three groups, In the multivariate analysi
s, pre-ICU quality-of-life was related to age, APACHE III score, and hospit
al mortality rate but not to TISS or ICU length of stay. Pre-ICU quality of
life was introduced as a variable in the APACHE III prediction model and e
ntered the model after acute physiology score, diagnosis, and age and befor
e prior patient location and comorbidities. The area under the receiver ope
rating characteristics curve was 0.834 when quality-of-life was included an
d 0.83 when not.
Conclusions. In Spain, the quality of life of critically if[ patients befor
e their ICU admission is good, and only a small proportion of patients have
a low quality of life before admission. Previous quality of life is relate
d to hospital mortality rate but contributes very little to the discriminat
ory ability of the APACHE III prediction model and has little influence on
ICU resource utilization as measured by length of stay and therapeutic acti
vity.