Evaluation of Bethesda guidelines in relation to microsatellite instability

Citation
Hp. Wullenweber et al., Evaluation of Bethesda guidelines in relation to microsatellite instability, DIS COL REC, 44(9), 2001, pp. 1281-1289
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
ISSN journal
00123706 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1281 - 1289
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(200109)44:9<1281:EOBGIR>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Bethesda guidelines were developed for selection of patients w hose tumors should be tested for high microsatellite instability. This stud y examined the validity of the different Bethesda criteria in relation to m icrosatellite instability status to simplify their use in clinical practice . METHODS: A total of 164 patients with colorectal or hereditary nonpolypos is colorectal cancer-associated cancers were registered on the basis of the Amsterdam criteria without age limitations (11 cases), multiple tumors (2 cases), the accumulation of colorectal cancer in the family (no first-degre e relatives affected or the index patient's age up to 50 years; 45 cases), an early age at onset up to 50 years (13 cases), morphologic and histopatho logic manifestations (right-sided colorectal cancer, mucinous undifferentia ted histology; 1 case), and the Bethesda criteria (92 cases). The microsate llite instability status of tumors was determined using the International C ollaborative Group on Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer marker ref erence panel. RESULTS: When applying all Bethesda criteria, high microsatel lite instability tumors were identified in our hereditary nonpolyposis colo rectal cancer registry with a sensitivity of 87 percent. Twenty-nine percen t (27/92) of the Bethesda-positive patients displayed high microsatellite i nstability compared with 6 percent of patients (4/72) not meeting these cri teria (P < 0.001). Only Bethesda Criteria 1, 3, and 4 showed a significantl y different distribution of the microsatellite instability status when comp ared with those of the remaining patients registered (P less than or equal to 0.001). These three criteria detected high microsatellite instability tu mors in 48 percent (10/21), 50 percent (18/36), and 31 percent (21/67) of p atients, respectively. When applying these criteria only, a cumulative dete ction rate of 77 percent of all (24/31) high microsatellite instability cas es was found, thereby identifying 89 percent of high microsatellite instabi lity tumors among the Bethesda-positive patients. Patients matching Criteri a 1, 3, and 4 frequently showed hMSH2 or hMLH1 germline mutations and tumor -specific loss of protein expression. CONCLUSION: In our hereditary nonpoly posis colorectal cancer registry the complete Bethesda criteria showed the highest sensitivity to identify patients with high microsatellite instabili ty tumors. However, for general medical practice outside academic centers, three criteria are reasonably accurate for adequate high microsatellite ins tability tumor selection.