Rectal sensory perception in females with obstructed defecation

Citation
Mj. Gosselink et Wr. Schouten, Rectal sensory perception in females with obstructed defecation, DIS COL REC, 44(9), 2001, pp. 1337-1344
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
ISSN journal
00123706 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1337 - 1344
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3706(200109)44:9<1337:RSPIFW>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
PURPOSE: Parasympathetic afferent nerves are thought to mediate rectal fill ing sensations. The role of sympathetic afferent nerves in the mediation of these sensations is unclear. Sympathetic nerves have been reported to medi ate nonspecific sensations in the pelvis or lower abdomen in patients with blocked parasympathetic afferent supply. It has been reported that the para sympathetic afferent nerves are stimulated by both slow ramp (cumulative) a nd fast phasic (intermittent) distention of the rectum, whereas the sympath etic afferent nerves are only stimulated by fast phasic distention. Therefo re, it might be useful to use the two distention protocols to differentiate between a parasympathetic and sympathetic afferent deficit. METHODS: Sixty control subjects (9 males; median age, 48 (range, 20-70) years) and 100 fe male patients (median age, 50 (range, 18-75) years) with obstructed defecat ion entered the study. Rectal sensory perception was assessed with an "infi nitely" compliant polyethylene bag and a computer-controlled air-injection system. This bag was inserted into the rectum and inflated with air to sele cted pressure levels according to two different distention protocols (fast phasic and slow ramp). The distending pressures needed to evoke rectal fill ing sensations, first sensation of content in the rectum, and earliest urge to defecate were noted, as was the maximum tolerable volume. RESULTS: In a ll control subjects, rectal filling sensations could be evoked. Twenty-one patients (21 percent) experienced no sensation at all in the pressure range between 0 and 65 mmHg during either slow ramp or fast phasic distention. T he pressure thresholds for first sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were significantly higher in patients with obstruc ted defecation (P < 0.001). In each subject, the pressure thresholds for fi rst sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were always the same, regardless of the type of distention. CONCLUSION: Rectal sensory perception is blunted or absent in the majority of patients with ob structed defecation. The observation that this abnormality can be detected by both distention protocols suggests that the parasympathetic afferent ner ves are deficient. Because none of the patients experienced a nonspecific s ensation in the pelvis or lower abdomen during fast phasic distention, it m ight be suggested that the sympathetic afferents are also deficient. This f inding implies that it is not worthwhile to use different distention protoc ols in patients with obstructed defecation.