Renal function is a very important prognostic indicator in patients with co
ngestive heart failure. While some of the prognostic importance of poor ren
al function is related to the worse physiology associated with it, there ar
e suggestions that the dysfunction itself is detrimental. Recently, it has
been shown that adenosine may mediate much kidney activity. In addition to
vasoconstrictive and vasodilatory effects, adenosine is intrinsic to the tu
buloglomerular feedback which occurs when an acute increase in sodium level
s in the proximal tubule feeds back to decrease glomerular filtration.
Adenosine works via both adenosine A(1) and A(2) receptors. A(1)-receptor a
ntagonists decrease afferent arteriolar pressure, and increase urine flow a
nd sodium excretion. Studies suggest that A(1)-receptor antagonists cause a
diuretic effect not by a change in the renal haemodynamics, but by the inh
ibition of water and sodium reabsorption in tubular sites secondary to dire
ct tubuloglomerular feedback. Less consistent has been the occasional findi
ng of increased glomerular filtration rate despite the lack of improved ren
al plasma flow.
Clinically important questions are: what role adenosine plays in causing th
e poor renal function associated with heart failure and what A(1)-receptor
antagonists do in such situations? If an A(1)-receptor antagonist could cau
se diuresis while maintaining or improving glomerular filtration, it would
be a useful adjunct in the treatment of severe heart failure. We evaluated
the effects of the A(1)-receptor antagonist CVT-124 (BG-9719) in heart fail
ure patients. CVT-124 increased sodium excretion without decreasing glomeru
lar filtration rate. These data suggest that adenosine might be an importan
t determinant of renal function in patients with heart failure.