Cj. Bidau et Da. Marti, Meiosis and the Neo-XY system of Dichroplus vittatus (Melanoplinae, Acrididae): a comparison between sexes, GENETICA, 110(2), 2000, pp. 185-194
The origin of neo-XY sex systems in Acrididae is usually explained through
an X-autosome centric fusion, and the behaviour of the neo-sex chromosomes
has been solely studied in males. In this paper we analysed male and female
Dichroplus vittatus. The karyotype comprises 2n = 20 chromosomes including
9 pairs of autosomes and a sex chromosome pair that includes a large metac
entric neo-X and a small telocentric neo-Y. We compared the meiotic behavio
ur of the sex bivalent between both sexes. Mean cell autosomal chiasma freq
uency was low in both sexes and slightly but significantly higher in males
than in females. Chiasma frequency of females increased significantly when
the sex-bivalent was included. Chiasma distribution was basically distal in
both sexes. Behaviour of the neo-XY pair is complex as a priori suggested
by its structure, which was analysed in mitosis and meiosis of diploid and
polyploid cells. During meiosis, orientation of the neo-XY is highly irregu
lar; only 21% of the metaphase I spermatocytes show standard orientation. I
n the rest of cells, the alternate or simultaneous activity of an extra kin
etochore in the distal end of the short arm (XL) of the neo-X, determined u
nusual MI orientations and a high frequency of non-disjunction and lagging
of the sex-chromosomes. In females, the neo-XX bivalent had a more regular
behaviour but showed 17% asynapsis in the XL arm which, in those cases orie
ntated its distal ends towards opposite spindle poles suggesting, again, th
e activity of a second kinetochore. The dicentric nature and the unstable m
eiotic behaviour of the sex neo-chromosomes of D. vittatus suggest a recent
origin of the sex determination mechanism, with presumable adaptive advant
ages which could compensate their potential negative heterosis. Our observa
tions suggest that the origin of the neo-sex system was a tandem fusion of
two original telocentric X-chromosomes followed by another tandem fusion wi
th the small megameric bivalent and a further pericentric inversion of the
neo-X. The remaining autosomal homolog resulted in the neo-Y chromosome.