Laws of negligence dictate that jurors' decisions about damages be influenc
ed by the severity of plaintiffs' injuries and not by the reprehensibility
of defendants' conduct. The authors simulated an automobile negligence tria
l to assess whether jurors' decisions are in accord with those expectations
. Conduct of the defendant and severity of the plaintiff's injuries were ma
nipulated, Jurors listened to the evidence, completed predeliberation quest
ionnaires, deliberated as a jury, and completed postdeliberation questionna
ires. Severity of the plaintiffs injury had a strong impact on damage award
s, but evidence related to the defendant's conduct was also influential, pa
rticularly when the plaintiffs injuries were mild. Here, jurors with any co
nduct-related evidence gave larger damage awards than jurors with no conduc
t-related evidence. Findings suggest an effect of defendant conduct on dama
ge awards that may be mediated by judgments that the defendant was negligen
t.