Markers of type I and III collagen turnover as indicators of growth velocity in very low birth weight infants

Citation
E. Kajantie et al., Markers of type I and III collagen turnover as indicators of growth velocity in very low birth weight infants, J CLIN END, 86(9), 2001, pp. 4299-4306
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
ISSN journal
0021972X → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
4299 - 4306
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(200109)86:9<4299:MOTIAI>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Monitoring postnatal growth in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants is comp licated by the difficulty of obtaining reliable measurements. A need thus e xists for safe and reliable indicators of such infants' short-term growth v elocity. We set out to study whether markers of type I collagen synthesis [ aminoterminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP)] or degradation [via the matrix metalloproteinase pathway, carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP)] or of type III collagen synthesis [amino-terminal prope ptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP)] could serve as such indicators. PINP, ICTP, and PIIINP were measured for 48 VLBW infants (mean birth weight , 923 g; range, 540-1485 g; mean gestational age, 27.6 wk; range, 23.7-32.7 wk) at the age of 1, 2,4, and 8 wk. At each time point, these were compare d with concurrent growth velocity rigorously assessed by frequent lower leg (knemometry) and weight measurements. PINP showed a significant positive correlation with lower leg growth veloci ty at 1, 2, and 4 wk and with weight growth velocity at 2, 4, and 8 wk. PII INP showed a significant positive correlation with lower leg growth at 1, 2 , and 8 wk and with weight growth at 2 and 8 wk. The ICTP/PINP ratio, refle cting type I collagen degradation in relation to its synthesis, showed clos e negative correlations with lower leg growth at 1 wk (r = -0.46; P=0.003), 2 wk (r = -0.51; P=0.002), and 4 wk (r = -0.56; P=0.001) and with weight gr owth at 2 wk (r = -0.39; P=0.018), 4 wk (r = -0.59; P=0.0003), and 8 wk (r = -0.53; P=0.005). A high ICTP/PINP ratio was an accurate predictor of impa ired growth; a high ICTP/PINP ratio was a more rapid and at least as sensit ive and specific indicator of slow growth as weight gain. We conclude that PINP, PIIINP, and the ICTP/PINP ratio all reflect postnata l growth velocity in VLBW infants. The most robust of these indicators is t he ICTP/PINP ratio, which may thus serve as a clinical tool in assessing sh ort-term growth of these infants.