K. Chwalisz (2001) and S. Maltzman (2001) recognized that H. Ahn and B. E.
Wampold's (2001) study demonstrated that component studies failed to identi
fy specific ingredients responsible for therapeutic benefits but cautioned
against rejecting a medical model of psychotherapy. The authors respond to
their comments by discussing 5 fallacies: (a) The alternative to the medica
l model is a collection of common factors; (b) medical model language is ap
propriate for describing psychological treatments; (c) the medical model is
valid, but only time will reveal evidence to support it; (d) rejection of
the medical model implies separation from the medical establishment; and (e
) a medical model conceptualization will further the mental health needs of
diverse communities.