Re. Mayer et al., Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding, J EDUC PSYC, 93(1), 2001, pp. 187-198
In 4 experiments, college students viewed an animation and listened to conc
urrent narration explaining the formation of lightning. When students also
received concurrent on-screen text that summarized (Experiment 1) or duplic
ated (Experiment 2) the narration, they performed worse on tests of retenti
on and transfer than did students who received no on-screen text. This redu
ndancy effect is consistent with a dual-channel theory of multimedia lean-L
ing in which adding on-screen text can overload the visual information-proc
essing channel, causing learners to split their visual attention between 2
sources. Lower transfer performance also occurred when the authors added in
teresting but irrelevant details to the narration (Experiment 1) or inserte
d interesting but conceptually irrelevant video clips within (Experiment 3)
or before the presentation (Experiment 4). This coherence effect is consis
tent with a seductive details hypothesis in which the inserted video and na
rration prime the activation of inappropriate prior knowledge as the organi
zing schema for the lesson.