To assess the validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction, student
s in Grades 1, 3, and 5 were asked to solve a set of simple subtraction pro
blems and were placed in the no-report, retrospective-report, or concurrent
-report conditions. Two aspects of verbal report validity were assessed: re
activity, or whether providing a verbal report alters subsequent task perfo
rmance, and veridicality, or whether the verbal reports are accurate reflec
tions of solution strategies. Students in all grades and in both the retros
pective-report and concurrent-report conditions were able to provide veridi
cal strategy reports, and the instruction to verbally report had few effect
s on task performance. Informal findings indicate that students had less di
fficulty reporting retrospectively than concurrently.