Yes-no and forced-choice tasks are common in psychology, but the empirical
relation between reported confidence in the 2 tasks has been unclear. The a
uthors examined this relation with 2 experiments. The general experimental
method had participants first report confidence in the truth of each of man
y general knowledge statements (a yes-no task) then report confidence in th
em again when the statements were put into pairs where it was known that on
e statement was true and one was false (a forced-choice task). At issue was
how confidence in the statements changed between the yes-no task and the f
orced-choice task. Two models, including the normative one, were ruled out
as descriptive models. A linear model and a multiplicative model remain via
ble contenders.