Many, but not all, observational epidemiological studies of ozone (O-3) air
pollution have yielded significant associations between variations in dail
y ambient concentrations of this pollutant and a wide range of adverse heal
th outcomes. We evaluate some past epidemiological studies that have assess
ed the short-term association Of O-3 with mortality, and investigate one po
ssible reason for variations in their O-3 effect estimate, i.e., difference
s in their approaches to the modeling of weather influences on mortality. F
or all of the total mortality-air pollution time-series studies considered,
the combined analysis yielded a relative risk, RR=1.036 per 100-ppb increa
se in daily 1-h maximum O-3 (95% Cl: 1.023-1.050). However, the subset of s
tudies that specified the nonlinear nature of the temperature-mortality ass
ociation yielded a combined estimate of RR=1.056 per 100 ppb (95% CI: 1.032
-1.081). This indicates that past time-series studies using linear temperat
ure-mortality specifications have underpredicted the premature mortality ef
fects of O-3 air pollution. For Detroit, Ml, an illustrative analysis of da
ily total mortality during 1985-1990 also indicated that the model weather
specification choice can influence the O-3 health effects estimate. Results
were intercompared for alternative weather specifications. Nonlinear speci
fications of temperature and relative humidity ( RH) yielded lower intercor
relations; with the O-3 coefficient, and larger O-3 RR estimates, than a ba
se model employing a simple linear spline of hot and cold temperature. We c
onclude that, unlike for particulate matter (PM) mass, the mortality effect
estimates derived by time-series analyses for O-3 can be sensitive to the
way that weather is addressed in the model. The same may well also be true
for other pollutants with largely temperature-dependent formation mechanism
s, such as secondary aerosols. Generally, we find that the O-3-mortality ef
fect estimate increases in size and statistical significance when the nonli
nearity and the humidity interaction of the temperature-health effect assoc
iation are incorporated into the model weather specification. We recommend
that a minimization of the intercorrelations of model coefficients be consi
dered (along with other critical factors such as goodness of fit, autocorre
lation, and overdispersion) when specifying such a model, especially when i
ndividual coefficients are to be interpreted for risk estimation.