Age estimates of the auricular surface (sacro-iliac joint) of the ilium tak
en from bony specimens, 35 mm slides, and digital images were compared for
29 intact specimens from archaeological contexts. Results demonstrate that
age estimates from all photographic and digital images may result in signif
icantly differing estimates of age than those from bony specimens. Of the i
maging techniques, 35 mm slides provided estimates most similar to those fr
om bony specimens. Digital images provided age estimates that varied more f
rom bony specimens. In general, photographic and digital images may offer r
esearchers a way of documenting age information that would otherwise be una
vailable or delayed. Yet, caution should be used when age estimates are der
ived solely from images rather than from bony specimens.