A young girl was the victim of a severe dog attack. An animal, suspected of
having caused the attack, was later impounded for investigation. Microclot
s of blood, recovered from the dog's fur, were analyzed by STR DNA. Results
showed that this blood was not related to the biting. Other forensic evide
nce-hairs, fibers, and odontology-failed to connect a particular animal to
the attack. The implications of these findings for the dog and its owners a
re discussed as well as other forensic methods for resolving such cases.