Glutamine in animal science and production

Citation
Ge. Lobley et al., Glutamine in animal science and production, J NUTR, 131(9), 2001, pp. 2525S-2531S
Citations number
75
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
ISSN journal
00223166 → ACNP
Volume
131
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Supplement
S
Pages
2525S - 2531S
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3166(200109)131:9<2525S:GIASAP>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
With its many proposed metabolic roles, glutamine would seem to have major potential in normal animal production systems as well as during situations involving adverse challenges. In practice, however, responses to glutamine supplementation have been inconsistent. Thus, during lactation and growth s tudies in ruminants, both positive and null effects on production responses have been reported. Similarly, therapeutic responses to glutamine suppleme ntation during various digestive tract disorders have been Inconsistent in both pigs and ruminants. This is despite a proven involvement in the nuclei c acid biosynthesis necessary to support cell proliferation. In sheep, at l east, glutamine may exert a protective effect against hepatic amino acid (A A) oxidation, particularly for methionine. This may offer anabolic potentia l because methionine is the first limiting AA in a number of animal feedstu ffs. Glutamine is also important in control of metabolic acidosis, but, in contrast to rodents, the main site of production seems to be extra-hepatic. In the immune system, while lymphocyte proliferation is glutamine-dependen t, intracellular concentrations are low (in contrast to other tissues, such as muscle and liver). Instead, glutamate is accumulated, but the majority of this (similar to 65%) is derived in vivo from plasma glutamine. In sheep , endotoxin challenge elevates the plasma flux of glutamine, with a corresp onding decrease in plasma concentration. At the same time, both the glutama te accumulation and fractional rate of protein synthesis within lymphocytes are enhanced. These lymphocyte responses, however, are not altered by an A A supplement that contains glutamine. Overall, although glutamine obviously plays important metabolic roles within the body, supplementation does not appear to provide consistent beneficial or therapeutic effects, except duri ng certain catabolic situations. Glutamine availability, therefore, does no t seem to be a limitation in many challenge situations. Rather, glutamine m ay signal alterations in nutrient demands among organs and a better underst anding of this role may increase understanding of where modulation of gluta mine status would be beneficial.