Two meanings of identification-as a developmental process and as a mechanis
m of defense-were investigated as they relate to identity status. Identific
ation with parents was assessed by comparing participants' "ideal self" Adj
ective Q-sort (Block, 1978) with the same Q-sort done for either mother or
father. Defense identification was assessed from TAT stories using Cramer's
(1991a) Defense Mechanism Manual. Marcia's (1966, 1980) categories of iden
tity status were determined from Mallory's (1989) prototypes based on the C
alifornia Adult Q-sort (Block, 1961/1978). The results indicated that the f
our identity statuses are differentially predicted by parent identification
, by defense identification, and by an interaction between the two types of
identification. Further, the nature of these relations differs by gender.
Caution should be used in applying these findings to other populations.