A first aim is to distinguish between two flutter regimes that are commonly
referred to as stall flutter because of their occurrence between a raised
working line and the stall boundary. The first one is of aeroacoustic origi
n, and it arises from a match between the acoustic impedance of the intake
duct and the upstream pressure perturbation due to fan vibration. The secon
d type is directly related to flow separation effects and shock properties.
Further objectives are to describe several numerical prediction methods, t
o compare their relative computational requirements, and to establish their
bounds of applicability to various flutter types. The unsteady flow is eit
her a linearization about a viscous nonlinear steady-state flow for a given
mode of vibration, or it is fully nonlinear. The prediction methods are cl
assified according to the way they treat the unsteady flow. In all cases, t
he fluid mesh was moved during the unsteady flow computations to follow the
structural motion. The performance of the methods was ranked for a rig fan
blade for which measurements were available. It was found that, near the s
tall boundary, flutter boundary could only be captured with an adequate rep
resentation of the unsteady viscous effects. It was concluded that the shoc
k had a stabilizing effect whereas the separation area behind it had a dest
abilizing effect.