Objective: The literature on the impact of headache has traditionally focus
ed on the relationship of subject variables to specific headache types. Rec
ently, increasing attention is being paid to the impact on disease of emoti
onal distress. The current study was designed to determine whether differen
ces in subject variables arose when comparing them by headache type vs. emp
irically derived emotional distress clusters. Method: A review of responses
to measures of headache impact (e.g., duration, medication use) and emotio
nal distress (Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI) completed by 292 patients atten
ding a headache clinic was conducted. Patient responses were analyzed by he
adache type and emotional distress cluster. Results: Comparison by headache
type revealed that combined headaches were of longer duration, used more m
edications, and were more likely to have seen a chiropractor. Comparison by
distress cluster revealed high-distress patients to have missed more days
of work, have legal involvement, have sought psychological services, and to
be male. Conclusion: The results suggest that clinically useful informatio
n can be obtained by using both headache diagnosis and emotional status. In
addition, this information may be useful by providing additional knowledge
that may lead to different clinical protocols in headache management. (C)
2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.