Inflatable insert products used to overcome residual limb shrinkage were ev
aluated in a bench test environment under compressive loading conditions. P
ressure-loss tests under static loading demonstrated that after inserts wer
e inflated to 43.4 to 45.6 kPa, insert pressures reduced from 0.09%/min to
1.36%/min in the first 5 min and from 0.00%/niin to 0.27%/min in the subseq
uent 55 min. As inserts were inflated, they demonstrated at least two phase
s in their pressure versus thickness curves: A relatively low-slope portion
(Phase I) was followed by a high-slope portion (Phase II). The transition
from Phase I to Phase II occurred at more than a 12-min thickness, a thickn
ess greater than that considered acceptable for practical clinical use (10
mm). This result suggests that in a socket, stress to resist insert expansi
on is taken by the residual limb and socket more than by the insert itself
Cyclic-loading tests under constrained thickness conditions demonstrated th
at local stiffness was more sensitive to insert pressure than to constraint
spacing (insert thickness). The static and dynamic test results help to ex
plain why some users claim that inserts do not provide equal and consistent
support unless inflated to a very high insert pressure. An insert that all
owed adjustment of the location of the Phase I to Phase II transition point
in the pressure versus thickness curve might help to overcome these limita
tions.