This pilot study examined the performance of an alternative computer visual
interface, the Virtual Retinal Display (VRD), for low-vision use. The VRD
scans laser fight directly onto the retina, creating a virtual image, Since
visually impaired individuals can have difficulty using computer displays,
a matched comparison study was done between the VRD and the standard catho
de ray tube (CRT) monitor. Reading speed and acuity tests were collected fr
om 13 low-vision volunteers selected to represent the broad range of partia
lly sighted individuals actively involved in the work force. Forty-six perc
ent of subjects had highest visual acuity while viewing the VRD; 30% of sub
jects had highest acuity viewing the CRT; and 24% of subjects had equal acu
ity across the two displays. Although mean reading speed across all 13 subj
ects indicated no significant difference between displays, individual subje
cts with predominantly optical causes of low vision exhibited clinically im
portant increases in reading speed versus the CRT. However, most subjects w
ith predominantly retinal damage showed a slight disadvantage using the VRD
. We give theoretical explanation to the bifurcated results and conclude th
at for a subset of low-vision users, the VRD technology is very promising a
s a basis for future low-vision aids.