The present study examined the impact of suppressive imagery (i.e., trying
to avoid a particular error), the frequency of this suppression, and attemp
ts to replace negative error-ridden images with positive ones on golf putti
ng performance. Novice golfers (N = 126) were assigned to a no-imagery cont
rol group or to 1 of 6 groups in a 3 x 2 design, with imagery type (positiv
e, suppression, suppression-replacement) and imagery frequency (before ever
y putt, before every third putt) as factors. Results showed that the accura
cy of the positive imagery group improved across imaging blocks-regardless
of imagery frequency. The suppression and suppression-replacement imagery g
roups' accuracy improved when imaging before every third putt, yet declined
when imaging before every putt. These findings suggest that frequent appli
cation of suppressive imagery hurts performance and that attempting to repl
ace negative images with corrective ones does not ameliorate the damage.