Wideband reflectance tympanometry was performed on twelve chinchillas ears.
The complex input impedance of the middle ear, multifrequency admittance t
ympanograms, reflectance patterns (reflectance versus frequency), and refle
ctance tympanograms (reflectance versus ear-canal air pressure) were analyz
ed and compared to human data. The complex impedance of the chinchilla ear
has a lower stiffness reactance at low frequencies, a higher mass reactance
at high frequencies, and a lower resistance compared to the human. Multifr
equency admittance tympanograms from chinchillas follow the same sequence o
f patterns as humans for low frequencies (<2 kHz). At higher frequencies ty
mpanograms from both species are poorly organized and do not follow a consi
stent sequence of patterns. Reflectance patterns of chinchillas and humans
are different. However, both species show high reflectance at low frequenci
es, regions of lower reflectance in mid-frequencies (2-6 kHz), and high ref
lectance at high frequencies (>8 kHz). Reflectance tympanograms for the two
species show a single, centrally located minimum at low frequencies (<2 kH
z) and are substantially different at higher frequencies. Results are shown
for two animals that underwent eustachian tube obstruction. Reflectance pa
tterns obtained with different ear-canal air pressures are substantially di
fferent. Reflectance results at any single ear-canal pressure (including am
bient pressure) do not completely characterize the effects of middle-ear pa
thology. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society of America.