Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership inDetroit
Pm. Lantz et al., Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership inDetroit, J URBAN H, 78(3), 2001, pp. 495-507
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE
This article reports the results of a formative evaluation of the first 4 y
ears of the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center (URC), a commu
nity-based participatory research partnership that was founded in 1995 with
core funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Se
veral organizations are members of this partnership, including a university
, six community-based organizations, a city health department, a health car
e system, and CDC. The Detroit URC is a strong partnership that has accompl
ished many of its goals, including the receipt of over $11 million in fundi
ng for 12 community-based participatory research projects during its initia
l 4 years. Detroit URC Board members identified a number of facilitating fa
ctors for their growth and achievements, such as (1) developing a sound inf
rastructure and set of processes for making decisions and working together,
(2) building trust among partners, (3) garnering committed and active lead
ership from community partners, and (4) receiving support from CDC. Board m
embers also identified a number of ongoing challenges, including organizati
onal constraints, time pressures, and balancing community interests in inte
rventions and academic research needs. Overall, the Detroit URC represents
a partnership approach to identifying community health concerns and impleme
nting potential solutions.