E. Smith et al., Evaluation of urinary continence and voiding function: Early results in men with neo-urethral modification of the Hautmann orthotopic neobladder, J UROL, 166(4), 2001, pp. 1346-1349
Purpose: At our institution we use the Hautmann orthotopic bladder replacem
ent with a chimney and neo-urethral modification. A neo-urethral tube allow
s tension-free intestino-urethral anastomosis, thus providing application o
f this procedure for patients who may otherwise not qualify due to the inab
ility of the small bowel to reach the urethra. However, this neo-urethral t
ube may also enhance continence by providing significant intra-abdominal ur
ethral length. Conversely, such a modification may be associated with a hig
her degree of urinary retention. Early evaluation and reporting on the resu
lts of this procedure appear warranted.
Materials and Methods: From April 1996 to March 2000, 14 consecutive male p
atients underwent cystoprostatectomy and urinary reconstruction with Hautma
nn repair using chimney and neo-urethral modifications. We performed a retr
ospective analysis of urinary function and continence with data obtained fr
om patient questionnaires completed preoperatively and at each postoperativ
e office visit. The examining physician chart notes were reviewed for infor
mation about urinary retention. The American Urological Association symptom
score and voiding bother index were used to assess urinary function and bo
ther, respectively. Urinary continence was defined as the complete absence
of any form of urinary leakage protection.
Results: Of the 14 patients 12 were completely continent day and night, wit
h a median followup of 17 months. There were 2 patients who wore pads less
than 7 months after surgery. Improvement of urinary continence appeared to
continue up to 12 months postoperatively. Despite this encouraging effect,
when our data were compared to the published literature, we noted a somewha
t increased incidence of patients requiring clean intermittent catheterizat
ion to manage significant post-void urinary residuals. We had no patients w
ith urethro-intestinal strictures who required clean intermittent catheteri
zation.
Conclusions: The neo-urethral tube modification appears to have a significa
nt and favorable impact on urinary continence while seeming to be associate
d with a trend towards an increased rate of chronic urinary retention. Long
er followup will be required to determine whether this higher rate of chron
ic urinary retention will remain stable or change with time.