Clinical trials in the 1990s using HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) s
howed that cholesterol-lowering treatment significantly reduces cardiovascu
lar events including strokes in the primary and secondary prevention of myo
cardial infarction (MI). Paradoxically, the link between serum cholesterol
level and the incidence of stroke remains to be fully established. This is
largely due to conflicting evidence from a. series of observational cohort
studies and a suggestion that lowering serum cholesterol increased the risk
for hemorrhagic stroke. These findings have tended to influence the treatm
ent of stroke, despite alternative interpretations for the failure of these
studies to find a clear association between cholesterol levels and stroke.
The statin trials present a strong argument for a reappraisal of the link b
etween cholesterol and stroke. Three meta-analyses have all shown a relativ
e risk reduction in stroke of 12 to 48% in patients with coronary heart dis
ease (CHD) after MI. There was no statistically significant increase in hem
orrhagic stroke. Recently, gemfibrozil has also been shown to reduce the re
lative risk for stroke (25%), which contradicts the findings of previous fi
brate trials.
It is becoming clear that the clinical action of many cholesterol-lowering
drugs is the result of pleiotropic/antiatherogenic effects rather than simp
ly a reduction in cholesterol. There is also evidence that these agents exe
rt direct effects that promote atherosclerotic plaque stability. After thes
e observations, it is now generally accepted that lipid lowering treatment
should be considered in all stroke patients with a history of CHD/MI. Howev
er, for the remaining patients with ischemic stroke, there is no proven the
rapeutic approach, and several large randomized, placebo-controlled trials
are under way or planned for this indication.