Lifestyle effects of group health education for patients with coronary heart disease

Citation
T. Van Elderen et E. Dusseldorp, Lifestyle effects of group health education for patients with coronary heart disease, PSYCHOL HEA, 16(3), 2001, pp. 327-341
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH
ISSN journal
08870446 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
327 - 341
Database
ISI
SICI code
0887-0446(2001)16:3<327:LEOGHE>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
In the present study, effects of a health education (INFO) and a PsychoEduc ational Prevention (INFO + PEP) programme were investigated in three hospit als. These programmes were offered to groups of coronary heart disease (CHD ) patients and their partners after discharge from hospital. The INFO was o ffered to 127 CHD patients in addition to FIT (i.e., standard medical care an physical training). The PEP was offered to 90 patients in addition to th e INFO and FIT. A control group of 122 patients received only FIT. The INFO and the PEP consisted of four weekly two-hour group sessions each. In addi tion, the PEP was followed by seven telephone follow-up contacts. On average, patients improved their lifestyles during the first three month s. Between three and twelve months an extra improvement was found for eatin g habits, whereas there was a relapse for smoking and a sedentary lifestyle . In the short term, angina pectoris and a longer period of heart complaint s were parallelled with a decrease in the risk of maintaining unhealthy eat ing habits, whereas in the long term a longer period of heart complaints, a younger age and unemployment predicted a lower risk of maintaining unhealt hy eating habits. In the short term living with a partner and in the long t erm female gender were predictive of continued smoking behaviour. In the sh ort term, older age, a first CABG and a specific hospital setting decreased the risk of a continued sedentary lifestyle. The FIT + INFO + PEP had a favourable short-term effect on eating habits. F or smoking and a sedentary lifestyle, however, there were negative effects. In the short term, patients in the FIT + INFO and those in the FIT + INFO + PEP had significantly more problems in quitting a sedentary lifestyle tha n those in the FIT intervention. In the long term, patients in the FIT + IN FO had significantly more problems in stopping smoking compared to those in the FIT.