Conventional radiographic contrast material-enhanced studies (eg, retrograd
e urethrography [RUG], voiding cystourethrography [VCUG], double-balloon ca
theter urethrography) and ultrasonography are useful in evaluating the anat
omy of the urethra but are limited in demonstrating anatomic derangement of
adjacent structures. Since the anatomic details of both the urethra and pe
riurethral tissues can be evaluated noninvasively with magnetic resonance (
MR) imaging, this modality can be used as an adjunctive tool for evaluation
of urethral abnormalities. In patients with congenital anomalies, MR imagi
ng is reserved for cases of intersex anomalies or complex genitourinary ano
malies, in which evaluation of internal organs is essential. MR imaging may
demonstrate diverticula that are not seen on radiographic contrast-enhance
d studies, including VCUG, RUG, or double-balloon catheter study. In cases
of inflammation MR imaging can demonstrate, not only inflammatory infiltrat
ion around the urethra but also the presence of a periurethral abscess or s
inus tract. In cases of trauma, MR imaging is helpful in assessing the pres
ence and extent of anterior or posterior urethral injury and predicting the
occurrence of complications. At MR imaging, a fistula can be seen as a dir
ect communicating channel with an adjacent organ. In patients with urethral
tumors, the major role of MR imaging is in local staging.