This paper argues for a structural definition of oppression as systematic m
istreatment. Using the work of Connell and other theorists, I discuss the i
mplications of the proposed definition for the oppression of women and sugg
est that men, too, are systematically mistreated and therefore oppressed in
modern societies. This structural concept of men's oppression is compared
with the idea developed in the men's movement of the 1970s that men are opp
ressed by sex roles, and with more recent discourses of masculinity. I argu
e that men may have conflicting interests in relation to the gender order.
While men are frequently the agents of the oppression of women, and in many
senses benefit from it, their interests in the gender order are not pregiv
en but constructed by and within it. Since in many ways men's human needs a
nd capacities are not met within the gender orders of modern societies, the
y also have a latent 'emancipatory interest' in their transformation.