Da. Revicki et al., TELEPHONE VERSUS IN-PERSON CLINICAL AND HEALTH-STATUS ASSESSMENT INTERVIEWS IN PATIENTS WITH BIPOLAR DISORDER, Harvard review of psychiatry, 5(2), 1997, pp. 75-81
We evaluated the correspondence between in-person- and telephone inter
view-derived data on affective symptoms, health-related quality of lif
e, disability days, and medication compliance in patients with bipolar
disorder. Twenty-eight outpatients with DSM-III-R-documented bipolar
disorder were randomly assigned to an initial in-person or telephone i
nterview. An average of 4.0 days later, they were reassessed by the ot
her interview method. Results indicate good to excellent agreement bet
ween telephone and in-person interviews on measures of mania (intracla
ss correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.92) and depression symptoms (ICC
= 0.90), suicide risk (kappa = 0.80), and alcohol use (kappa = 0.61),
scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey
(ICCs = 0.66-0.92), and medication compliance (ICCs = 0.50-0.66). Meas
ures of bed disability days (ICC = 0.34) and restricted activity days
(ICC = 0.66) showed less agreement. Telephone interviews are feasible
and reliable for collecting data on psychiatric and other health-relat
ed outcomes in bipolar disorder patients.