TELEPHONE VERSUS IN-PERSON CLINICAL AND HEALTH-STATUS ASSESSMENT INTERVIEWS IN PATIENTS WITH BIPOLAR DISORDER

Citation
Da. Revicki et al., TELEPHONE VERSUS IN-PERSON CLINICAL AND HEALTH-STATUS ASSESSMENT INTERVIEWS IN PATIENTS WITH BIPOLAR DISORDER, Harvard review of psychiatry, 5(2), 1997, pp. 75-81
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
ISSN journal
10673229
Volume
5
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
75 - 81
Database
ISI
SICI code
1067-3229(1997)5:2<75:TVICAH>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
We evaluated the correspondence between in-person- and telephone inter view-derived data on affective symptoms, health-related quality of lif e, disability days, and medication compliance in patients with bipolar disorder. Twenty-eight outpatients with DSM-III-R-documented bipolar disorder were randomly assigned to an initial in-person or telephone i nterview. An average of 4.0 days later, they were reassessed by the ot her interview method. Results indicate good to excellent agreement bet ween telephone and in-person interviews on measures of mania (intracla ss correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.92) and depression symptoms (ICC = 0.90), suicide risk (kappa = 0.80), and alcohol use (kappa = 0.61), scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (ICCs = 0.66-0.92), and medication compliance (ICCs = 0.50-0.66). Meas ures of bed disability days (ICC = 0.34) and restricted activity days (ICC = 0.66) showed less agreement. Telephone interviews are feasible and reliable for collecting data on psychiatric and other health-relat ed outcomes in bipolar disorder patients.