Study Design. A prospective observational study was conducted on the use of
the Chinese version of the North wick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire.
Objective. To examine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the
Chinese version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire in Chinese pa
tients with neck pain in Hong Kong.
Summary of Background Data. There is increasing recognition that patient pe
rspectives are essential both in making medical decisions and in judging th
e treatment outcomes, A valid Chinese version of a neck disability index qu
estionnaire is urgently needed for effective and reliable evaluation of the
treatment outcomes for patients with neck pain.
Methods. Two samples with 532 consecutive adult patients with neck pain fro
m seven physiotherapy outpatient departments in Hong Kong who completed the
Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire were observed and measured at diffe
rent intervals: at the beginning of physiotherapy, at 7 days, at 3 weeks, a
nd 6 weeks after physiotherapy.
Results. The questionnaire had good content validity, very good test-retest
reliability, and internal consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient,
0.95; Cronbach's alpha, 0.87.) It also had good validity (Spearman correla
tion coefficient of 0.59 when the score was correlated with that of a gener
ic 42-item Chinese health questionnaire) and good responsiveness (effect si
ze of 1.11 at week 6 after treatment began).
Conclusions. The Chinese version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionna
ire has been shown to demonstrate very good content validity, a high degree
of test-retest reliability, and internal consistency. It also exhibited go
od construct validity and high sensitivity to changes in severity over time
.