Effect of cold ischemic time and HLA matching in kidneys coming from "young" and "old" donors - Do not leave for tomorrow what you can do tonight

Citation
A. Asderakis et al., Effect of cold ischemic time and HLA matching in kidneys coming from "young" and "old" donors - Do not leave for tomorrow what you can do tonight, TRANSPLANT, 72(4), 2001, pp. 674-678
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
00411337 → ACNP
Volume
72
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
674 - 678
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-1337(20010827)72:4<674:EOCITA>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background. Kidneys from older donors are likely to have a lower nephron ma ss. Nevertheless they constitute a valuable source of kidney allografts. Lo ng cold ischemic time (CIT), with or without delayed graft function (DGF), has been associated with reduced graft survival. The aim of this study was to review the experience of a single UK center to assess the interaction of cold storage time, donor age, organ exchange, and HLA-DR mismatching on sh ort- and long-term survival. Methods. We analyzed 788 first cadaver kidneytransplants that were performe d in our center from 1990 to 1997 and had complete data available. A donor age of 55 years was the cutoff age for "old" and "young" donor kidneys. The primary outcome measured was graft failure from any cause. Results. There were 132 grafts from donors 55 years or older (16.7%), with 76.8% of the kidneys implanted after > 20 hr of CIT. Kidney grafts from don ors older than 55 years had worse graft survival than grafts from donors yo unger than 55 (87% vs. 78% at 1 year and 80% vs. 58% at 5 years after trans plant, P=0.0001). A CIT of > 20 hr significantly reduced graft survival (91 % vs.74.3% at 5 years after transplant, P=0.0002) in the young donor group and was associated with an overall graft survival in the old donor group of 57.5% at 5 years. In the same group, ignoring the HLA-DR mismatching to ac hieve shorter CIT, the predicted initial cost on graft survival at 1 year w ould have been 3.7% but would have increased to 9% 5 years after transplant . For young donors a CIT of > 20 hr had a cost of approximately 18% at 5-ye ar graft survival, far higher than a single DR mismatch. Occurrence of DGF decreased survival in both short (P=0.001) and long (P=0.00001) CIT groups. Conclusion. Forming local alliances (common recipient lists) and minimizing delays within the hospital might reduce CIT and DGF while achieving excell ent HILA matching. This should improve significantly the outcome of both ol d and young donor kidney grafts.