R. Hofstein et al., CONSTRAINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOFUNGICIDES - THE EXAMPLE OF AQ10, A NEW PRODUCT FOR CONTROLLING POWDERY MILDEWS, Entomophaga, 41(3-4), 1996, pp. 455-460
Over recent years, the company ECOGEN Inc. has been successfully devel
oping a biofungicide known under the trade name 'AQ10' in the USA wher
e it has been authorized in 1994 for controlling powdery mildews on va
rious host plants. This new product is based on the use of Ampelomyces
quisqualis, an hyperparasitic fungal species infesting representative
s of Erysiphaceae (powdery mildews) only. The production process now a
llows for the hyperparasite to be mass-cultured and formulated into an
easily water-dispersed, dry powder which preserves spore viability at
room temperature for a period in excess of 12 months. Upon spraying,
the conidia germinate rapidly to effectively attack any developing pow
dery mildew colonies. Efforts are now concentrating on experimental ap
plication schedules in vineyards aimed at defining an optimal position
ing of the biofungicide within existing disease control programmes. Th
e pilot trials are being conducted over a large number of wine-produci
ng areas under a Mediterranean climate around the world where powdery
mildew represents the major pest problem. Results obtained so far show
that in order to achieve an optimal, cost-effective, consistent disea
se control, the biofungicide has to be applied before the incidence of
powdery mildew has reached high levels, and at any of the three most
susceptible growth stages of grapevine, i.e. bud break, between flower
ing and bunch closure, and just before veraison. The biofungicide may
therefore be used as a curative to slightly preventative control agent
likely to fit into any IPM strategies. The various technical problems
associated with the development and industrial production of this new
biofungicide are largely solved. Constraints relating to designing co
mprehensive, user-friendly IPM programmes which. include 'AQ10' still
require adjustments in terms of defining spraying dates and intervals
according to a range of agricultural practices, climatic changes likel
y to occur during the season, and compatibility for tank-mixing with o
ther pesticides. A number of additional constraints relate to official
registration in various countries, distributors' and farmers' accepta
nce of a new, 'living' product: these are still more difficult to addr
ess because they claim for a profound change in the users' general att
itude towards controlling diseases of cultivated plants.