Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke

Citation
Jhw. Pexman et al., Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke, AM J NEUROR, 22(8), 2001, pp. 1534-1542
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01956108 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1534 - 1542
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-6108(200109)22:8<1534:UOTASP>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinicians are insecure reading CT scans by using t he one-third rule for acute middle cerebral artery stroke (1/3 MCA rule) be fore treating patients with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. The 1 /3 MCA rule is a poorly defined volumetric estimate of the size of cerebral infarction of the MCA. A 10-point quantitative topographic CT scan score, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), is described and illus trated. A sharp increase in dependence and death occurs with an ASPECTS of 7 or less. We describe how to use ASPECTS and why it works with CT scans ob tained on all commonly used axial baselines. We also describe interobserver reliability among clinicians from different specialties and with different experience in reading CT scans in the context of acute stroke. METHODS: The six physicians who developed ASPECTS answered a questionnaire on precisely how they interpret and use ASPECTS. The ASPECTS areas as inter preted by these physicians were compared with one another and with standard s in the literature. kappa statistics were used to assess the interobserver reliability of ASPECTS versus the 1/3 MCA rule. RESULTS: The exact methods of interpretation varied among the six individua l observers, with either a 3:3 or 4:2 split on the specific questions. The overall interobserver agreement was good compared with that of the 1/3 MCA rule. Normal anatomic vascular and interobserver variations explain why ASP ECTS can be applied with different CT axial baselines. CONCLUSION: ASPECTS is a systematic, robust, and practical method that can be applied to different axial baselines. Clinician agreement is superior to that of the 1/3 MCA rule.