N. Gregson et al., Whose economy for whose culture? Moving beyond oppositional talk in European debate about economy and culture, ANTIPODE, 33(4), 2001, pp. 616-646
This paper provides an overview of the economy-culture debate as currently
rehearsed within European urban and regional change circles, explores some
of the key theoretical inadequacies of this debate and outlines and illustr
ates one possible way of moving debate forward. The paper begins by identif
ying the different ways in which economy and culture, and economy-culture a
rticulations, are thought about within this debate and by arguing that what
purports to be a debate about articulation collapses in practice into the
respective privileging of either culture or economy. Subsequently, after a
critique of the "economy-culture as differential logics" argument, we forwa
rd what we consider to be the minimal conditions for conjoining economy and
culture theoretically. These entail according economy and culture equivale
nt conceptual standing, centring meaning and seeing meaning and practice as
conceptually inseparable. We then illustrate this approach at the level of
particularities, using a range of examples that span commodities, "product
ive" practices and processes of consumption and exchange.