In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), viral or bacterial infecti
ons are postulated to abolish or impair response to recombinant erythropoie
tin (Epogen). However, previous reports revealed that response to Epogen am
ong hemodialysis patients with a particular viral infection-human immunodef
iciency virus (HIV)-seems to be variable and is independent of illness seve
rity. To further explore the issue of response to Epogen in hemodialysis pa
tients with viral infection, we retrospectively studied four patients with
hepatitis B virus infection over a 3 month period to compare their response
to Epogen and endogenous erythropoietin levels with those of a control gro
up of patients without hepatitis B virus infection.
Weekly predialysis hematocrit, and monthly serum albumin concentration, tra
nsferrin saturation as well as percent reduction of urea were obtained from
patient records, and mean values were calculated for each subject. Mean ag
e of the patients (n = 4) was 63 +/- 7.5 years compared with 55 +/- 23 year
s for the control subjects (n = 4)(p = 0.02). The mean hematocrit of the st
udy patients was 33.7 +/- 2.8% compared with 34.7 +/- 4.9% in the control s
ubjects (p = 0.49), and the mean endogenous erythropoietin level in the stu
dy patients was 27 +/- 22 mIU/ml compared with 5.7 +/- 1.9 mIU/ml in the co
ntrol group (p = 0.001). The mean dose of thrice weekly Epogen, both at ons
et of the study and when endogenous erythropoietin was measured, was 61 +/-
19 U/kg body weight in the patients, compared with 74 +/- 8 U/kg body weig
ht in the control subjects (p = 0.002). We conclude that patients with ESRD
and hepatitis B surface antigenemia respond to Epogen as well as their cou
nterparts without hepatitis B virus infection. in addition, patients with h
epatitis B surface antigenemia have much higher serum levels of endogenous
erythropoietin and require less exogenous erythropoietin injections than th
eir counterparts.